MUSTAFA AKSAKAL : THE WAR THAT MADE THE MIDDLE EAST : WORLD WAR 1 AND THE END OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

Mustafa Aksakal

The Ottoman Empire collapse  at the end of the First World War is often  treated  as a foregone  conclusion. It was only a matter of time  the story goes, before  the so-called ‘sick man’ of Europe  succumbed  to its ailments– incompetent  management,  nationalism, ethnic  and religious conflict.

Mustafa Aksakal overturns this conventional narrative in this book. Aksakal is an associate  professor  of History  at Georgetown University  where he teaches courses  in Ottoman  and modern Turkish history  He  holds fellowships from Princeton and the American Council of Learned  Societies.

He describes  how European  Imperial ambitions and Ottoman  commitment  to saving its empire at any cost– including  the destruction  of the Armenian community  with deaths of more than a million  Ottoman troops and other civilians– led to the empire’s  violent  partition  and created politically unstable  Middle East. 

THE WAR THAT MADE THE MIDDLE EAST shows that until 1914, the Ottoman Empire  was a viable  multi-ethnic, multi-religious state, and the relations between  Arabs, Jews, Muslims  and Christians  of the empire  were relatively stable.  When the war broke out the Ottoman government  sought an alliance  with the Entente but was rejected  because  of British  and French had designs  on the Eastern Mediterranean.

After the Ottomans  entered the fight on the side of Germany  and were defeated,  Britain  and France  seized  Ottoman lands and a new national elites in former Ottoman  territories  claimed  their  own states. The region was renamed “The Middle East”, erasing a robust  and modernising  600-year-old empire. Mustafa Aksakal wanted to capture  many of the complexities  of the Ottoman  First World War and the empire’s dissolution  in 1922. He stresses that the national identities that we associated  with the Middle East  today came into being  only in the war’s aftermath. With the loss of financial control  came the incremental  erosion  of the empire’s political independence  and Arab lands of the Ottoman Empire  became British or French ruled colonies under the designation of “mandates”. It also marked the birth of statelessness  of the Palestinian  and Kurdish  people.

The state within the Ottoman political competition for resources  and a deadly confrontation  with groups and populations  whose loyalties  is questioned–Armenians, Assyrian,  Greek Orthodox Christians, Muslim Arabs and Kurds. In a sense, the Ottoman Empire  was at war against the world and against itself. Historians  are usually  loathe  to ask “What If?”  but in the book, the author  gets close. The Ottoman state took the war to its own communities  before taking it to the Great Powers. It was this dynamic  including  the Unionist decision- making that helped implode  the Empire. One has to remember  that the Ottoman Empire  was an empire: self determination  wasn’t part of their vocabulary.  Its the economic upheaval that Aksakal explores.

When war broke out, the government  in Istanbul,  its military already weakened by losses in the Balkan  Wars, issued conscription orders that removed hundreds of thousands  of agricultural  workers from the fields,  requisitioning  the animals,  as well, reducing the acreage  under cultivation. Couple this with a region-wide plague of locusts  and a blockade  of shipping  across the  Mediterranean,  this meant starvation  across the empire. But rather than reduce military operations  which would include  the Armenian genocide  on the assumption  that the Armenians would be rebellious  or disloyal. In the end the Ottoman Empire collapsed with Kemal Atarurk’s Republican Peoples Party claiming sovereignty  over the Turkish  remnant  alone and the new states forming across  the Middle East.  The “what if” continues  engaging in the counter-factual for a moment, if there had been no series  of wars from 1911 to 1922, or no World War in 1914, it is possible  that the empire might have overcome its not insignificant  internal problems  and survivedp further  into the 20th century

The parliament  that opened in late 1908 might have over the long term proved to be an engine for reform, also perhaps  providing institutional framework  for overcoming  ethnic and religious  differences.  Perhaps the empire wasn’t doomed in 1914. More of an upheaval  was the uprooting of hundreds of thousands  of people as an exchange  of Muslim population residing in Greece with Christian population  residing in Anatolia.  This was done in the name of creating homogeneous  nation-states in Greece  and Turkey,  respectfully.

 

Leave a Comment

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Search

Subscribe to our Bi-Weekly Newstetter

Sign up for our bi-weekly newsletter to receive updates and stay informed about art and cultural events around Sydney. – it’s free!

Want More?

Get exclusive access to free giveaways and double passes to cinema and theatre events across Sydney. 

Scroll to Top