MICHAEL HERR ‘KUBRICK’ : THE WORKINGS OF A GENIUS

Biographer Michael Herr
Entering the house of Kubrick’s obsessive, often brutal devotion to filmmaking is a trip dipped in awe and fascination.
Michael Herr pays unsentimental homage  to a friend remembering  the humour,  the burning  intelligence  with the sanity  of a 20th century master.  By his premature  end of a career  that spanned Eyes Wide Shut, The Shining, Lolita, Barry Lyndon, 2001: A Space OdysseyA  Clockwork Orange, and Dr Strangelove, his legacy lives large.
KUBRICK is Michael Herr’s memoir of his nearly 20-year friendship  and collaboration  with Stanley Kubrick,  one of the greatest film makers of all time.  From their  first meeting  at an advanced screening  of The Shining  in 1980, Kubrick  and Herr began  an intensive  intellectual  exchange that grew into the ground breaking  Vietnam  film Full Metal Jacket.  The book  is full of personal insights  and anecdotes,  probing into the inner life of a man whose creative  passion  and powerful  intellect  changed film making as an art forever, and the complicated, often misunderstood  man behind the art.
Said to be a hermit,  he was a complete  failure as a recluse. Stanley  saw a lot of people, sometimes even going out to see people,  but not so often.. He was a gregarious  man especially over the phone,  which he viewed the way Mao viewed warfare, as an instrument  of a protracted  offensive where control of the ground was critical  and timing crucial,  while time itself was meaningless, except  as something  to be kept on your side. Somebody  who knew him, 70 years ago when he was starting out, said, “Stanley  always acted like he knew something  you didn’t know,”   By the time time he was through having what he called ” strenuous intercourse” with you, he knew most of what you knew  as well. He was called an earwig; he’d go in one ear and not come out of the other until he’d eaten clean through  your head.
Stanley  had views on everything,  but not necessarily  political. He thought  the best system  of government  was under a benign  despot.  I wonder what he would have made of Trump. In Hollywood  his attire was described  as “Beatnik”. He loved the biz, the industry, the action he observed every day and night from his bridge; all those actors and directors  and projects, all the dumb  energy endlessly  turning up at the studios and the PR that came with each new product; he loved being part of it from his amazing energy, and in terms of being  a player, he didn’t  see himself as better or worse, higher or lower, than any of them in play together,  playing towards commerce  and art, big expensive  art and works of art for the cash register  or, as the biographer recalls, art films with blockbuster  pretensions. He wasn’t exactly a show person, but knew a lot about the process and protocols.  He wasn’t  self-absorbed,  obsessive retentive,  a monomaniac or more egocentric  than anybody else in the industry.
It’s been said by critics  that he was a misogynist,  although  he photographed some women beautifully: Jean Simmons  in Spartacus,  Sue Lyon in Lolita, Marisa Berenson in Barry Lyndon and judging  from the 90 second trailer  for Eyes Wide Shut,  Nicole Kidman. His films were certainly  unromantic,  possibly  even anti-romantic. He wouldn’t  make happy love stories. Dozens of articles  and few too many books considered Stanley  cold. This perception  devolved into cant  among  many critics,  who called his work sterile.
He had more compartments  in his head than anyone ever knew, and he would open or close them selectively  to the people  he was working with, or to each of his friends; the one with the money  in it, the one where he kept all his toys, the one where he kept his most personal  things,  like his hopes and fears, that sort of thing, and whatever he loved most beside work, his family and friends, his dogs and cats. And however  adroitly  he manipulated the doors to those compartments- now open-now closed- essentially  Kubrick was a very open guy. Still none of those compartments  ever sprang open accidentally.  Beyond those compartments,  and governing  them, was a capability  to take his intelligence  up or down as circumstances  required,  without  ever being  obscure  or patronising,  a rather beautiful  quality of mind.
 The flood of obituaries  and “tributes” to Stanley Kubrick  was overwhelming  yet he was dismissed  as a mechanic  even though you could instantly  tell it was a Kubrick  movie the instant it started. He made movies of incredible purity.

Leave a Comment

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Search

Subscribe to our Bi-Weekly Newstetter

Sign up for our bi-weekly newsletter to receive updates and stay informed about art and cultural events around Sydney. – it’s free!

Want More?

Get exclusive access to free giveaways and double passes to cinema and theatre events across Sydney. 

Scroll to Top